Neuroscientists Reveal Anna Karenina Principle in Brain's Response to Persuasion
A team of researchers at HSE University investigated the neural mechanisms involved in how the brain processes persuasive messages. Using functional MRI, the researchers recorded how the participants' brains reacted to expert arguments about the harmful health effects of sugar consumption. The findings revealed that all unpersuaded individuals' brains responded to the messages in a similar manner, whereas each persuaded individual produced a unique neural response. This suggests that successful persuasive messages influence opinions in a highly individual manner, appearing to find a unique key to each person's brain. The study findings have been published in PNAS.
Persuading people to adopt a healthier lifestyle can be accomplished through effective argumentation. For several years, researchers at the HSE Institute for Cognitive Neuroscience have been investigating how expert arguments about healthy eating can influence a person's willingness to purchase sugar-free foods, and, most importantly, which areas of the brain are involved.
In a recent study, neuroscientists at HSE University compare the brain responses of individuals who are likely to be persuaded by expert arguments with those who resist persuasion. Unlike traditional research approaches, where participants are exposed to isolated words or phrases, the researchers presented the subjects with an expert's talk on the health risks of sugar consumption. This approach supports a more realistic laboratory simulation of persuasive communication. To obtain a comprehensive and detailed picture of neural activity in different groups of participants, the researchers employed functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Using the mathematical method of intersubject correlation analysis, the researchers then examined whether the neural responses to the healthy eating call were similar or varied across participants.
The experiment involved 50 participants and consisted of two parts. First, participants were asked to rate three types of products—sugar-containing, sugar-free, and non-edible—and to place bids on each by indicating how much they would be willing to pay. Next, the participants listened to a 7-minute lecture by an expert on the health risks of sugar consumption, after which they were asked to bid on the same products once again. Throughout the experiment, the researchers monitored the participants' brain activity using fMRI.
As a result of the healthy eating message, some participants changed their minds in favour of a healthier diet. The persuaded group also displayed highly varied patterns of brain activity, in particular a greater diversity of activity in the lower regions of the frontal cortex, an area crucial for decision-making and social cognition.
In contrast, the brains of participants who were sceptical and unpersuaded by the expert's arguments processed the information all in a similar manner. They showed high synchronisation of activity in brain regions linked to self-reflection and critical assessment of information.
'We used an unconventional method to study brain activity: we examined the similarity of neural activity across a group of individuals. In scientific terms, this is referred to as "intersubject correlation of brain activity." Our findings can be described as a type of Anna Karenina effect, where the responses of those who are indifferent and immune to arguments are alike, while each persuaded individual responds in their own unique way. Apparently, an effective persuasive message can adapt to individuals' unique characteristics, targeting aspects that are particularly relevant to each listener,' explains Vasily Klyucharev, Head of the International Laboratory of Social Neurobiology and of this research project.
Interestingly, participants influenced by the expert's talk were willing to pay more for healthy food, but the value they placed on sugar-containing food did not decrease. According to the researchers, this may be due to the structure of the audio message: towards the end, the expert emphasised the benefits of healthy eating rather than the negative effects of sugar consumption. Information that concludes a message is typically remembered best.
Ioannis Ntoumanis
'In the future, we hope to continue studying this "Anna Karenina effect" to identify the reasons behind the differences in neuronal activity among those who are persuaded. Does the effectiveness of persuasive messages depend on the chosen arguments, and what factors exactly influence people? All of this can improve the perception of public health messages, making them more personalised and, as a result, more effective,' according to Ioannis Ntoumanis, Junior Research Fellow at the International Laboratory of Social Neurobiology and co-author of the study.
The study was conducted within the framework of the strategic project 'Human Brain Resilience: Neurocognitive Technologies for Adaptation, Learning, Development and Rehabilitation in a Changing Environment' ('Priority 2030').
See also:
Mathematician from HSE University–Nizhny Novgorod Solves Equation Considered Unsolvable in Quadratures Since 19th Century
Mathematician Ivan Remizov from HSE University–Nizhny Novgorod and the Institute for Information Transmission Problems of the Russian Academy of Sciences has made a conceptual breakthrough in the theory of differential equations. He has derived a universal formula for solving problems that had been considered unsolvable in quadratures for more than 190 years. This result fundamentally reshapes one of the oldest areas of mathematics and has potential to have important implications for fundamental physics and economics. The paper has been published in Vladikavkaz Mathematical Journal.
Scientists Reveal How Language Supports Complex Cognitive Processing in the Brain
Valeria Vinogradova, a researcher at HSE University, together with British colleagues, studied how language proficiency affects cognitive processing in deaf adults. The study showed that higher language proficiency—regardless of whether the language is signed or spoken—is associated with higher activity and stronger functional connectivity within the brain network responsible for cognitive task performance. The findings have been published in Cerebral Cortex.
HSE AI Research Centre Simplifies Particle Physics Experiments
Scientists at the HSE AI Research Centre have developed a novel approach to determining robustness in deep learning models. Their method works eight times faster than an exhaustive model search and significantly reduces the need for manual verification. It can be applied to particle physics problems using neural networks of various architectures. The study has been published in IEEE Access.
Scientists Show That Peer Influence Can Be as Effective as Expert Advice
Eating habits can be shaped not only by the authority of medical experts but also through ordinary conversations among friends. Researchers at HSE University have shown that advice from peers to reduce sugar consumption is just as effective as advice from experts. The study's findings have been published in Frontiers in Nutrition.
HSE University Develops Tool for Assessing Text Complexity in Low-Resource Languages
Researchers at the HSE Centre for Language and Brain have developed a tool for assessing text complexity in low-resource languages. The first version supports several of Russia’s minority languages, including Adyghe, Bashkir, Buryat, Tatar, Ossetian, and Udmurt. This is the first tool of its kind designed specifically for these languages, taking into account their unique morphological and lexical features.
HSE Scientists Uncover How Authoritativeness Shapes Trust
Researchers at the HSE Institute for Cognitive Neuroscience have studied how the brain responds to audio deepfakes—realistic fake speech recordings created using AI. The study shows that people tend to trust the current opinion of an authoritative speaker even when new statements contradict the speaker’s previous position. This effect also occurs when the statement conflicts with the listener’s internal attitudes. The research has been published in the journal NeuroImage.
Language Mapping in the Operating Room: HSE Neurolinguists Assist Surgeons in Complex Brain Surgery
Researchers from the HSE Center for Language and Brain took part in brain surgery on a patient who had been seriously wounded in the SMO. A shell fragment approximately five centimetres long entered through the eye socket, penetrated the cranial cavity, and became lodged in the brain, piercing the temporal lobe responsible for language. Surgeons at the Burdenko Main Military Clinical Hospital removed the foreign object while the patient remained conscious. During the operation, neurolinguists conducted language tests to ensure that language function was preserved.
AI Overestimates How Smart People Are, According to HSE Economists
Scientists at HSE University have found that current AI models, including ChatGPT and Claude, tend to overestimate the rationality of their human opponents—whether first-year undergraduate students or experienced scientists—in strategic thinking games, such as the Keynesian beauty contest. While these models attempt to predict human behaviour, they often end up playing 'too smart' and losing because they assume a higher level of logic in people than is actually present. The study has been published in the Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
Scientists Discover One of the Longest-Lasting Cases of COVID-19
An international team, including researchers from HSE University, examined an unusual SARS-CoV-2 sample obtained from an HIV-positive patient. Genetic analysis revealed multiple mutations and showed that the virus had been evolving inside the patient’s body for two years. This finding supports the theory that the virus can persist in individuals for years, gradually accumulate mutations, and eventually spill back into the population. The study's findings have been published in Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology.
HSE Scientists Use MEG for Precise Language Mapping in the Brain
Scientists at the HSE Centre for Language and Brain have demonstrated a more accurate way to identify the boundaries of language regions in the brain. They used magnetoencephalography (MEG) together with a sentence-completion task, which activates language areas and reveals their functioning in real time. This approach can help clinicians plan surgeries more effectively and improve diagnostic accuracy in cases where fMRI is not the optimal method. The study has been published in the European Journal of Neuroscience.